Work · correction

Removing paint, carefully, to remove the scratches in it.

That is the whole mechanism, stated without decoration. Correction does not add gloss. It takes clear coat away, level with the bottom of the defects, until what is left is flat enough to reflect properly.

The mechanism, stated plainly

Clear coat is removed, level with the bottom of the defect. Correction does not add gloss. It spends depth, and depth does not grow back.

Inside a wash bay, floor still wet — **A swirl and a scratch differ only in depth** — and depth is the entire cost. Leveling the clear coat to the bottom of wash marring is a few microns. Leveling it to the bottom of a scratch a fingernail catches is most of what is left. That is why the deep ones get reduced and written down rather than chased.

Rain beading into tight droplets on a freshly polished red roof — **Drawn to scale, from the readings on the report above.** The hatched strip at the top of the hood’s clear coat is what one aggressive cutting pass spends: three to five microns, gone. The hatched block over the roof is the 32 to 52 microns it is already short of every other panel on the car, and nothing in this building puts it back. That is the whole argument for the $0.00 line.

A clean, fully detailed engine bay with the bonnet up — **Photograph to be made:** a single corrected panel with the light box reflected in it, shot square so the reflection edge stays straight. One panel, one light, no comparison and no second frame beside it.

Depth is the only conversation

A swirl is a shallow scratch. A hologram — the oily-looking trail left by a rotary in the wrong hands — is a scratch. A towel line is a scratch. Etching from a bird dropping is a small crater. Every one of them is missing material, not added material, which is why no bottle removes them and why every one is fixed by the same physical act: abrading the surrounding clear coat down until the low point is no longer low.

Since the clear coat is roughly 40–50 µm and one aggressive compounding pass takes 3–5, there is a hard limit on how many times any panel can go through this. The gauge exists to find that limit before the polisher does.

How a panel gets decided

Readings first. Three per panel, averaged, written on the report. Consistent numbers across a car mean original paint. A low outlier means somebody has been here before us. A very high one means filler and a respray, which behaves differently under a pad and is easy to burn through at an edge.
Then a test section. Half a meter of a door, a chosen pad and polish, one pass, wiped down and inspected under a point light from three angles. Clear coats differ enormously by manufacturer: some are hard and give up nothing to a soft pad, some are soft enough that a heavy combination leaves its own micro-marring behind that then has to be refined out.
Then the ceiling. The test tells us what one pass achieves. If ninety per cent of the defects come out in one pass, that is the job. If the last ten per cent would take two more passes on a panel reading thin, that ten per cent stays, and it goes on the report as reduced rather than removed.

Filling is not correcting

There are products that make swirls vanish for three washes. Glazes and heavy all-in-ones carry oils and polymers that settle into a scratch and bend light so the eye cannot see it. The car looks extraordinary at handover. Then it rains properly, or the fourth wash strips the oils, and the swirls reappear identically, because they never went anywhere.

Nothing here is finished with a filler. Panels are wiped down with a dedicated panel wipe before final inspection, precisely so that what you are shown is the paint and not the polish sitting in it.

Single-stage paint

Older cars, some solid commercial colors, some reds and whites: pigment and binder with no clear layer over it. The pad comes back the color of the car because it is removing color. These finishes oxidize to a chalky surface that comes back beautifully with light work and then punishes anyone who keeps going. They get a lighter combination, a much firmer limit, and usually a wax rather than a coating — a starved single-stage finish wants feeding, not sealing.

What we will not do

Cut a panel reading well below the rest of the car. It gets refined by hand and reported.
Chase a scratch your fingernail drops into. That is through the clear coat and it is a paint repair.
Wet sand a panel because a defect is stubborn, unless the readings genuinely support it and you have been told exactly what is being spent.
Use a rotary to save time on a finish that will show every hologram it leaves.

Before and after · no images on this site

This is where a correction gallery belongs, and it is deliberately empty. A before-and-after pair is the single most persuasive image in this trade, which is exactly why a generated or stock pair here would not be a placeholder — it would be a fabricated result.

On a live site every frame here would be the studio’s own photographs of its own customers’ cars, shot under the same light, with the panel and the readings named.

Request a slot